Monday, April 13, 2020

Upper Deck Hall of Fame Overview - Members, Nominees, and Benchmarks

As we make our decisions regarding Hall of Famers, here is some information about our current Hall of Famers, as well as our current nominees, that may help you fill out your ballot.

A. Current Hall of Famers and Statistics

I. Position Players


II. Starting Pitchers



III. Relief Pitchers




Hall of Fame Composite

I. Position Players

The average Hall of Fame position player was a heart of the order hitter, with 2,477 hits, 406 doubles, 500 home runs, 1,523 RBI and a 0.897 on base plus slugging (OPS, excluding hit by pitch or sacrifice data). Additionally, the average Hall of Fame position player made seven All Star appearances, won one MVP, one Gold Glove, five Silver Sluggers, and won two World Series rings.

On a per game basis, the average Hall of Fame position player accrued 1.1 hits in 3.7 at bats, doubled and homered at roughly equivalent rates (0.2 each), scored and batted in 0.7 run, and walked 0.4 times compared with 0.5 strike outs.

II. Starting Pitchers 

The average Hall of Fame starting pitcher demonstrated excellent control, winning 264 games and losing 150, collecting 3,010 strikeouts against just 1,091 walks, and throwing to a 1.20 WHIP and 3.38 ERA. The average SP made seven All Star appearances, won two Cy Young Awards, one Silver Slugger, and one World Series ring.

On a per game basis, the average Hall of Fame starting pitcher went six innings, allowed 5.5 hits, 1.8 walks, and 2.3 earned runs while striking out 4.9.

III. Relief Pitchers 

The average Hall of Fame relief pitcher was a reliable back-end bullpen arm, averaging 467 saves out of 548 opportunities (85.2%) in 989 total appearances. He allowed 1.19 baserunners per inning pitched and kept a 3.17 ERA. He averaged eight All Star appearances, three Fireman of the Year awards, and one World Series ring.

On a per game basis, the average Hall of Fame reliever pitched an inning and a third, allowed a hit, 0.4 walks and 0.4 earned runs, and struck out 0.9.

B. Hall of Fame Nominees and Statistics

I. Position Players




II. Starting Pitchers



III. Relief Pitchers




Comparison

Clearly, the averages for all three groups are significantly lower than our current group of Hall of Famers in virtually every category. However, several players rank as above average, compared with current Hall of Famers, in various categories, including some who would rank in the Top 5 of some categories if elected. Those will be outlined below.

Additionally, I included per game averages, in order to capture how these players stack up with the Hall of Famers. Theoretically, this could capture somebody whose career was not long enough to reach certain counting milestones, e.g. 300 wins, but who had a strong peak during which they were one of the best in the league.

In the meantime, it is important to remember that these are averages: some people fall above, and some people fall below, including current Hall of Famers. Simply falling below the average should not be the sole basis for exclusion. I encourage all owners to look at player holistically and vote on the merits.


Above Average Position Players

The tables below list each nominated position player and whether or not they were above average in a given category, when compared to current Hall of Famers, on both an absolute and per game basis.

Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Statistical Averages



Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Award Averages




Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Per Game Averages




Above Average Starting Pitchers
The tables below list each nominated starting pitcher and whether or not they were above average in a given category, when compared to current Hall of Famers, on both an absolute and per game basis.

Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Statistical Averages



Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Award Averages



Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Per Game Averages



Above Average Relief Pitchers
The tables below list each nominated relief pitcher and whether or not they were above average in a given category, when compared to current Hall of Famers, on both an absolute and per game basis.

Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Statistical Averages


Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Award Averages


Above Average When Compared with Hall of Famer Per Game Averages



C. Analysis

Position Players

Among nominated position players, Hideo Yang and Zephyr Pavlov lead the field in terms of categories in which they surpass the Hall of Fame statistical and award averages, with 10 each. Ahmed Newfield and John Buddie are next with eight a piece, followed by Rodrigo Johnson and C.J. Mitre with six.

On a per game basis, however, Pavlov clearly leads the pack with 12, followed by Yang with 10, and then Gregg Franklin, Jumbo Jenkins, Magglio Quevedo, and Newfield with 7.

Only five players average more hits per game than the current Hall of Famers: Yang, Pavlov, Quevedo, Newfield, and Buddie. Three average more home runs: Pavlov, Mitre, and Terrence Barnes. Just five average more RBI per game: Barnes, Jenkins, Mitre, Pavlov, and Quevedo.

Only Buddie and Johnson met the average number of All Star appearances by current Hall of Famers, with seven. Jenkins was right behind them with six. Nobody else had more than four.

The only nominee to win an MVP was Pavlov, who did it just once. Buddie, Newfield, and Jenkins lead all nominees with Silver Sluggers (6, 5, and 4, respectively).


Starting Pitchers


None of the starting pitchers in this year’s class of nominees rank above average in terms of wins, although four of the five did lose more games than the average Hall of Fame starter. Sam Clancy is the only not to have done so. All five starters have worse opponent averages, opponent on base percentages, opponent slugging percentages, WHIPs, and ERAs than the average Hall of Fame starter, as well.

Despite that, Bert Bechler and Odalis Mesa both pitched more innings than the average Hall of Fame starter, and Bechler has the distinction of being the only starter in this year’s class with more strikeouts than the average Hall of Famer - as well as the only in this year’s class with more than 3,000, a feat that only four Hall of Famers have achieved.

Bechler and Clancy came closest to the average number of All Star appearances among current Hall of Famers (7) with six each. Similarly, Clancy, Luis Diaz, and Howie Henry each won one Cy Young Award, falling just short of the average for current Hall of Famers (2). The only current nominee, however, actually to beat any award average among current Hall members was Clancy, on the strength of his three Gold Gloves.

On a per game basis, no starting pitcher was demonstrably better than those currently in the Hall, with the exception of Bechler striking out more hitters per game.


Relief Pitchers


Among relievers, Pedro Ordonez was the only closer to have saved more games than the average Hall of Famer, and at a higher rate (86.3%). Conversely, Albert Jimenez spent more time as a set up man, with more appearances than the average reliever, despite fewer saves and opportunities.

Neither pitcher accrued accolades to the same level as current Hall of Famers, with Ordonez winning the only Fireman of the Year award among the two, though Ordonez and Jimenez both made their share of All Star games, attending six and three, respectively. Opponents also fared better against both closers, although Ordonez successfully limited extra base hits at a better rate than the average Hall of Famer.

On a per game basis, neither pitcher was demonstrably better than those closers already enshrined.

D. Hall of Fame Benchmarks

Among hitters, a number of statistical benchmarks appear to be coalescing. I made a determination on these by calculating the number at or above which 75% of current Hall of Famers ended their careers.

The position player benchmarks are as follows:


Statistical Category
Number
Hits
2,276
Doubles
347
Home Runs
426
RBI
1,373
Batting Average
0.286
OPS
0.868
All Star Appearances
5
Silver Sluggers
3
Therefore, one might expect that any position player accruing at least these statistics and winning at least this amount of awards, would have a good shot at being elected to the Hall of Fame.

The benchmarks for starting pitchers are as follows:


Statistical Category
Number
Wins
251
Innings Pitched
3,494
K
2,610
WHIP*
1.20
ERA*
3.20
All Star Appearances
5
Cy Young Awards
0
* These categories were determined using the third quartile, i.e. finding the level at this 75% of Hall of Famers fell at or below over their career.

Therefore, one might expect that any starting pitcher accruing at least these statistics and winning at least this amount of awards, would have a good shot at being elected to the Hall of Fame.
The benchmarks for relief pitchers are as follows:


Statistical Category
Number
Saves
419
Innings Pitched
1,103
K
822
WHIP*
1.22
ERA*
3.41
All Star Appearances
7
Fireman of the Year Awards
3
* These categories were determined using the third quartile, i.e. finding the level at this 75% of Hall of Famers fell at or below over their career.

Therefore, one might expect that any starting pitcher accruing at least these statistics and winning at least this amount of awards, would have a good shot at being elected to the Hall of Fame.

E. Notes and Lingering Questions

It’s easy for us to think of our Hall of Famers in the context of Major League Baseball: 3,000 hits, 300 wins. The fact of the matter, though, is that longevity in Hardball Dynasty is highly variable, and a career that lasts longer than a solid decade is hard to come by. Despite this, Upper Deck has a long history and we have, through our voting patterns, determined what benchmarks, on average, we deem to be worthy of enshrinement.

Many of the players in this year’s class do happen to fall below Upper Deck’s own historical averages. That said, the way that we vote this year will shift those averages in one direction or another, and just because a player is below those numbers does not mean he is not worthy.

How long was the player’s peak? How strong was it?

No Hall of Fame pitcher has ever won the Most Valuable Player award. Should a starter who wins the MVP be a shoo-in for enshrinement? Should a reliever who wins the Cy Young be a shoo-in?

Could a shut down reliever who never closed games be elected?

Only one Hall of Fame position player has fewer than 2,000 hits. Could another do so? Could we elect a defensive wizard whose offensive statistics pale in comparison to the averages?

There are many questions we have yet to answer, but that we will over time. We’re a relatively young world, but it is exciting each year to draft talent, to watch those players progress, win awards, and meet milestones, and later to determine if they did enough to make the Hall.

Saturday, October 12, 2019

Upper Deck All-Time Franchise Rankings


Upper Deck All Time Rankings formula

All Time Rankings Formula Point distribution
1. Post season performance - 34.8%
2. Awards & Achievements - 30.2%
  • MVP, Cy Young, RoY, Fireman - 8.9%
  • Silver Slugger - 8%
  • Gold Glover - 8%
  • HoF: 5.5%

3. Team Statistics - 22.6%
  • Runs - 5.65%
  • ERA - 5.65%
  • Fielding Percentage 5.65%
  • Fielding +/- plays net diff 5.65%
4. All-Time standings W/L - 12.4%


Ways of getting points
    Postseason:
  1. World Series - 24
  2. LCS Winner - 12
  3. DCS Winner - 8
  4. Division winner or wild card winner - 4
  5. Wild card loss - 2

     Awards:
  1. HoF - 10
  2. MVP or Cy Young 4
  3. ROY - 1
  4. FOY - 1
  5. SS - 1
  6. GG - 1
     Team Statistics: (total points are multiplied by .40 to get end point total)
  1. Runs - avg finish from 1-32. 1st place = 64, 2nd place 62, etc
  2. ERA -  avg finish from 1-32. 1st place = 64, 2nd place 62, etc
  3. Fielding % -  avg finish from 1-32. 1st place = 64, 2nd place 62, etc
  4. Net +/- plays diff -  avg finish from 1-32. 1st place = 64, 2nd place 62, etc
     All time Standings
  1.  Finish from 1-32. 1st place = 64, 2nd place 62, etc



By The Numbers:

Monday, July 1, 2019

On Steven Roosevelt's New Contract, Backloaded Deals, and Possible Rules

There was a reasonable amount of world discussion about the contract recently signed by Steven Roosevelt - probably more than any one transaction that I have seen in my 14 seasons as commissioner of Upper Deck.  My own two cents regarding this particular deal, deals like it, and the fallout are numerous. They include:


Thoughts about Roosevelt's new deal


  1. Roosevelt currently represents one of the best, if not the best, complete package at SS - a premium position.  He has won a Gold Glove at shortstop to go with six Silver Sluggers at the position, seven All Star Appearances, and even won the Home Run Derby once.  Over the past ten seasons, no other player has won both a Gold Glove and Silver Slugger at shortstop (though a few Silver Slugger SS have won GG at other positions), and few have made as many All Star appearances. It is easy to make the argument that Roosevelt is a generational talent.
  2. For this season and at least the next one, he’s virtually guaranteed to be worth his salary ($23 million total).  Beyond season 34, even if Roosevelt’s defense begins to slip, his makeup suggests that he’ll still probably be an above average or replacement level bat with a good glove at the hot corner.
  3. The final season of the deal is a mutual option, so even if he’s vastly diminished by age 36, it’ll be a $4.5m buyout, not an $18 million salary. All told, the contract guarantees $61.5 million over four years.  Should a new owner inherit this contract, I don't think it will be considered an albatross, nor for very long if it is.

Thoughts about backloaded contracts


  1. There are pros and cons to front or backloading contracts. For a team who’s won a lot in recent seasons, as Richmond has, backloading is sometimes the only way to structure deals that fit within budgetary constraints. Personally, I don’t like to backload, but I have done it when necessary. It has not always planned out for me. 
  2. This does happen in real sports, as well. People sign bad contracts that the next regime must work around. However, the risk/reward nature of free agency is very real, and I appreciate that realistic aspect of offseason strategy in Hardball Dynasty.

A defense of both owners

  1. Ted is a former longtime owner in this world and is not the type of owner I’d expect to obliterate a team and run. He has been successful during both runs to date. 
  2. I would add that Jt is another good, longtime owner who cares about the health of the world, which we can all appreciate, whether or not we agree with his sentiment or his approach.

Where do we go from here?

Every once in a while, a situation arises that makes a private world such as ours consider rule changes.  This may or may not result in a rule change, but for the benefit of Upper Deck, I figured that we may as well have a discussion about it.

The issue at hand is one that I have seen in other worlds - one GM or owner inheriting heavily backloaded and, in some cases, franchise-crippling contracts.  While I do not believe that that will be the case for Ted's deal with Roosevelt, nor that we have had this particular issue in Upper Deck, we can discuss possible rules to govern this behavior.

Possible Rules Changes


  1. Implementing a salary cap.  Requiring that all owners cap their team's payroll at $100 million, for example, would surely keep the number of max contracts down, and would give some competitive edge to those owners who have been financially prudent, and/or whose teams have been rebuilding.
  2. Setting a maximum contract value. In CAPB, they play with a $75 million max contract value, where now single season can top $15 million in salary. This includes signing bonus.  Deals signed prior to implementation would be grandfathered in.  Penalties for violation would have to be discussed.
    • Personally, I don't know that I would support this for Upper Deck, though one consequence is that payroll stays relatively low.  With that said, I happened to inherit a team with two max contracts ($75m/5y) that were true albatrosses.
  3. Enforcing a more rigid contract structure.  In this case, we could require that the fourth and fifth seasons of a five-year deal could not exceed $13 million per season, leaving the max contract as $86 million over five years ($96 including a first season signing bonus).
    • In practice, this could equate to a front-loading policy, and could punish owners who have won recently and whose payrolls are likelier to be higher in current seasons.
These are those ideas that I have come up with to this point. Comment below or send me a Trade Chat to voice your opinion on a rule change.  If more owners support a rule change than not, we will vote on the most popular rule change, with a two-thirds vote (22 owners) needed to ratify the rule change.

Sunday, July 23, 2017

NL East Preview: Season 26

This entry marks the fourth of a series of previews by division for the young 26th season of Upper Deck.  A run down of each team will be followed by an overall analysis of the division.  We will continue with the NL East.








In season 25, the Boston franchise faced an abrupt change in ownership and, ultimately, its second consecutive losing season.  After a long run of success, including a World Series victory just five seasons ago, the Beaneaters find themselves in the relativey early stages of a rebuild, though new general manager jimmy1217 made some positive steps in that regard this offseason.


All-Star Ivan Romero was allowed to walk via free agency, giving the team the 24th overall pick in this season’s amateur draft as compensation.  Season 25 All-Star 1B Alex Cortez was also traded in a blockbuster deal that brought a couple of future ML contributors and SS Julio Villarreal to Boston.  Steady 3B Doug Burks also left via free agency.


Romero and Cortez helped lead Boston to one of the league’s top offenses a season ago, despite a defense and pitching staff that both ranked second to last.  With their bats out of the lineup, the Beaneaters seem committed to a rebuild, an assessment that includes the departure of reliable starter Orlando Campos.  Several Rule 5 draft picks and pitchers were added to the club to replace their productivity, including relievers Clayton Van Poppel and Will Ferguson, and 25-year old starter Nestor Gabriel.








Since GM DWobble took over the Charlotte Pups franchise, he has seemed singularly focused on rebuilding the historic Upper Deck club that has failed to post a winning record since season 20.  A season ago, the Pups were roughly average on all sides of the ball and finished in third place, managing to avoid the cellar for the fourth consecutive season.


This offseason, the franchise’s movement toward youth continued, with aging starters/relievers Del Hernandez and Jackie Colbrunn being let go, as well as longtime LF Derrick Watkins, who won two World Series rings with the franchise in seasons 17 and 19.  Thirty-something relievers Alberto Maradona and Glen Thomson were signed to replace some of those innings, and three-time Silver Slugger winner Willie Bennett became one of the club’s highest profile signings under DWobble’s leadership.


Perhaps the most notable move, though, is the four-year extension of young RF Nipsey Paulsen (.878 OPS in season 25).  And though the club traded Hamish Chance (26 HR in season 25) for a relief pitching prospect, many of the club’s best players, including season 25 Rookie of the Year 1B Steve Edmonds and 25-year old CP Josh Snelling should give Pups fans hope that there is currently more light than tunnel.








After two consecutive World Series appearances in seasons 23 and 24, the New York Knights took a step back in season 25… or, as much of a step back as any team that wins 104 games can take.  Despite a record that was actually a two-win improvement over the previous season, the club failed to make the League Championship Series last season.  


With the league’s top pitching staff (3.13 ERA) and a top-five defense, there isn’t much room for improvement.  The Knights were outhit by the league in season 25, though, and GM tedwilliams1 made some moves to spark the club.  Aging bench bat Sparky McMurtry was let go in favor of young DH Aaron King, non-tendered by Baltimore, and the powerful RF Yamid Wilfredo.


Additionally, aging pitcher Joe Matheson was let go after a productive season 25, though it is hard to imagine that they will miss him much.  Under tedwilliams1’s direction, the club’s piggyback-style rotation has led to incredible success, with SP Heinie Swann winning three of the last four National League Cy Young Awards while with the New York franchise.  The Knights’ strong pitching staff should once again power the club in season 26.








With its above average pitching staff and roughly league-average offense, the Penn Quakers posted their best win-loss record a season ago (87-75) since winning 89 games back in season 22.  Despite that mark of success, as well as the vast improvement the club has made since GM Xtrahits took over after a 99-loss campaign in season 18, Philadelphia again failed to make the postseason for the first time since season 5.


To begin one of the more aggressive offseasons for a club, Xtrahits took part in a blockbuster with the New Britain Rock Cats, acquiring All-Star CF Jolbert Cabrera to play second base, a move that will vastly increase the production at the position over former 2B Cleatus Walters.  Though the club did have to part ways with a pair of prospects and starter Von Boucher to make the deal work, starter Bert Bechler, with 189 career wins and five All-Star appearances, was signed to replace him in the rotation.  SP Joshua Park and RP Glenallen Ferrara were also let go.


The Penn Quakers also signed season 25 Gold Glove winner Alan Ott to fortify the bench and reliever Max Trajano to contribute out of the pen.  In addition to those transactions, one of the most significant moves was the retention of free agent LF Will McRae, one of the best hitters in this season’s free agent class and a longtime Penn Quaker.


NL East Analysis


New York had a fairly quiet offseason, though as one of the best teams in the entire league - one who retained much of last season’s roster - you wouldn’t expect the Knights to need much revamping in an attempt to return to their third World Series in four seasons.  They should once again be the favorite to take the NL East, though several huge upgrades in Philadelphia should make the division tighter and could give the Penn Quakers their third playoff berth in franchise history.

Under new management, Boston made strides in their rebuild efforts and have multiple first round draft picks this season, which should excite fans in what one might expect to be a down season.  Charlotte, on the other hand, had their most aggressive offseason under current leadership and should be competitive sooner than later, though the Pups may still be a season or two off.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

AL East Preview: Season 26

This entry marks the third of a series of previews by division for the upcoming 26th season of Upper Deck.  A run down of each team will be followed by an overall analysis of the division.  We will continue with the AL East.


Key additions: CF Chris Fleming

Key losses: DH Aaron King

On the strength of a top-ten pitching staff and an offense that out-slugged the average team, Baltimore won 93 games snapped a three-season playoff drought.  With that sort of success, it is not surprising that longtime general manager krisr took a rather quiet approach to the offseason.

Arbitration-eligible DH Aaron King was released in one of the most notable moves that the Dry Docks made this offseason, paving the way for future Hall of Famer Don Tamura to transition to designated hitter on a full time basis.  The club also brought in powerful center fielder Chris Fleming, though his contributions will likely be limited to a platoon scenario.

Most importantly, key Dry Docks like ace SP Luis Diaz are still under contract through at least this season, although he and a few others will need to negotiate extensions to stay in Baltimore and play with rising stars RF Charlie Anna and 2B Perry Horton, two players who may be allow Baltimore to forego a rebuild as its current core ages.




In season 25, the Swinging Hoosiers were one of the victims of playing in the best division in Upper Deck.  At 81-81, four games better than one playoff team, Indianapolis finished fourth out of four and hit the links early despite a top-five offense highlighted by RF Ron Diaz (.999 OPS in season 25).  It was the second time in three seasons that the Swinging Hoosiers finished in fourth place with a .500 record.

The good news for Swinging Hoosiers fans is that Diaz is under team control for at least the next five seasons.  The bad news is that longtime GM egide was willing to sever ties with some very familiar names, highlighted by All-Time Upper Deck Saves leader Diory Escuela and outfielder Travis Friend, who drove in 103 run just three seasons ago.  Shortstop Don Suzuki was also released before the arbitration process.

The other good news is that egide signed starter Orlando Campos to fortify a pitching staff that was in the bottom half of the league last season and took a $3.6M chance on a defensive shortstop who could prove to be more valuable than Suzuki.  And, of course that, something else nice came out of season 25 for the Swinging Hoosiers: SS Eddie Anderson, a game-changing talent out of Payton High School in Arizona.




Between seasons nine and 23, the Iowa City Small Bears recorded exactly zero seasons at or above .500.  Their last postseason appearance came a season earlier than that.  In season 24, however, the Small Bears took a huge step forward, winning 97 games - nine better than the 88 they posted in season 23 - and built off of that success in season 25 to win the AL East division for just the second time in franchise history and earning the playoffs’ top seed in the American League.

The only real priority for the club was to address its middling offense, which it did by adding slugging first baseman Malik Padden.  Elsewhere, the club needed only minor tweaks, as the Small Bears earned the third best team ERA in the league (3.31) and an above average defense.  GM rschaitkin acquired reliever Scott Koskie from Albuquerque to make up for the loss of Will Ferguson, who declined his end of a mutual option to become a free agent.  Reliever/occasional starter Carl Henry also walked.

For Iowa City, the fruits of a very long rebuild have finally borne fruit, with young talents like 2B Tex Stetter and SP Yonder Lopez indicating that the Small Bears and their recent successes are probably here to stay.

Pittsburgh Pilots



The Pilots, who had won four division titles over six seasons beginning in season 19, including three consecutively from 22-24, were unable to keep pace with the improving Baltimore and Iowa City clubs and missed out on the postseason for the first time since season 18.  The Pilots managed to demonstrate its elite defense (100 plus plays to only 15 minus plays, the highest and third lowest numbers league wide, respectively), though the offense was more-or-less average and the pitching staff took a step back from the year prior.

To address these areas, GM cshake93 started by parting ways with several aging vets, including starter Rick Roosevelt, CF Galahad Merloni, and utility man Alan Ott, who won a Gold Glove for his services in left in season 25.  Andy Stark, owner of the 515 career homers, was also let go after declining his end of a mutual option.  A trio of relievers were also let go: arb-eligible Wayne Miles and Buddy Rose, and ground ball specialist Sven Lillibridge.

Cshake93 replaced the lost offense by shipping shortstop Julio Villarreal and two of the organization’s better prospects to Boston for big bopper Alex Cortez (.884 career OPS) and by signing both Vladimir Ozuna (.240 career ISO) and jewel of the Free Agent class Ivan Romero (326 career HR).  Starter Octavio Castillo, who has quietly put together 241 career victories, joins a rotation featuring reigning Cy Young winner SP Timothy Hamilton, and Luis Mantalban joins the Pilots bullpen for the second stint of his career.

AL East Analysis

It is anybody’s guess who might ultimately win what is probably the most competitive division in Upper Deck.

Indianapolis and Pittsburgh more drastically reshaped their rosters, with both clubs cutting ties with some longtime players in favor of younger talent.  The Swinging Hoosiers addressed some needs, though not necessarily enough to make up the 15 games that separated them from the Small Bears last season.  The Pilots had a very active offseason, attempting to return to first place before a championship window closes on a core that is rapidly becoming more expensive and approaching free agency.

Conversely, despite a relatively quiet offseason, Iowa City has all the tools to defend its season 25 division title this year and beyond.  Similarly, Baltimore had a low-key offseason, the focus remaining primarily on the window of the core that took them back to the playoffs, but that may become untenable in the not-so-distant future, like Pittsburgh.